![]() |
In my last entry, I posted my crazy-advanced {{Security Breach = Bad}} equation and sarcastically noted that the results of our survey, along with a super computer and a team of data scientists and behavioral economists, arrived at the “Bad” conclusion associated with Security Breach liabilities. My sarcasm in that post was the end product of a suspicion that had been growing with alarming frequency over the last few years. Thankfully, that suspicion is now, after having attended the largest Cybersecurity conference in the world – RSA Conference in San Francisco, history.
I had become convinced that most of the security industry had stalled and appeared to be chasing either the ghosts of threat vectors past and / or was missing the charge to the 3rd Platform. Either way, I was absolutely convinced that the vertical was stuck in the halcyon days of the 2nd platform and we were all missing the altered landscape brought to us by Big Data.
So what’s different? How did my conversion come to pass?
I’ll admit that the listener hears what they want to hear… or maybe I’m hearing what I want to hear. But there were several vendors on the floor at Mascone that not only agree with Art, they happen to be rolling out product that is designed to drive to the heart of the dialogue he’s leading – “We don’t need more security, we need better security”. Which means we need better products, better services… better solutions. Dare I say, we need more predictive capabilities and less reactive capabilities… especially when the reaction happens AFTER making headlines in the Wall Street Journal. As my learned colleague, professor Burgess, told me “I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been.” – Wayne Gretzky |
